Erev Rav, Amalek, ...Where's Moshiach?

                              IDF (Israeli Defense Forces)

ology.com News: 

Fictional Scenario ; This Is Why We Need To Daven!

Some day in the very near future, Americans will awake to a terrifying scenario:


Overnight, elements of the Israeli Air Force conducted surgical strikes in Iran to neutralize their nuclear activities. Simultaneously, Israel conducted raids into Southern Lebanon and Gaza to limit the retaliatory capability of Iranian surrogates Hezbollah and Hamas.

Iran responded to the attacks immediately by closing and mining the straits of Hormuz and launching missile strikes into Iraq, Kuwait and at U.S. carrier groups in the region. Unconfirmed reports have surfaced that a “suicide submarine” has exploded alongside the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln and the crew members are fighting to save the ship.

America activated its NATO allies and conducted preliminary retaliatory strikes into Iran, targeting the Islamic Republic’s government and Revolutionary Guards Corps bases.

Russia and China moved immediately to condemn the Israeli attack and the U.S. support that made it possible. Meanwhile, Iran has activated its cells around the globe and bombs have already gone off at multiple American and Israeli diplomatic and military installations in Europe and Asia.

Global markets collapse and crude oil prices spike exponentially – by the open of the markets in New York City, gasoline approaches an average of $6 per gallon. Saudi authorities release millions of barrels of crude to stabilize oil prices and are themselves targeted by Iranian surface-to-surface missiles. With Saudi oil fields ablaze, crude spikes and the Euro drops to all-time lows against the Dollar which is itself in free fall.

These are the first hours of the war with Iran.

The world is moving uncomfortably close to a scenario that closely mirrors what could be considered the worst case scenario for intervention into Iran’s rapid nuclearization – a unilateral Israeli strike on the Islamic Republic’s nuclear facilities. Iran announced that it will make a major announcement regarding its nuclear program tomorrow – many suspect that Iran will tout its mastery of the nuclear fuel cycle and its ability to produce sanctioned nuclear materials domestically.

As a possible means of heading off an imminent attack by Israel on Iranian nuclear facilities, U.S. defense officials have been consistently providing to the press a narrow timeline for Israeli action – sooner rather than later is the order of the day.

If Israel is allowed to conduct this intervention on its own, less than a year after the Arab Spring effectively has done away with the peace hashed out by Sadat and Begin in the 1978 Camp David Accords, the consequences for the Middle East will be dramatic and unpredictable. What is certain is that the “Arab Street” will be consumed white hot with a passion and desire for revenge against the West and the newly revolutionary governments in North Africa and the Middle East may well oblige.

Over a decade, the world’s Western leaders allowed this crisis to grow; punting the consequences of strong action until they simply ran out of field. They sowed the wind and now they reap the whirlwind.

It Looks Like The End, Feels Like The End, Smells Like The End, ...

5772 Reasons To Believe

[I'd hate to have to have  "5786" reasons to believe in the Keitz - What would that look like?] 

Read more »

Shhhhh, It's A Secret!

Newsweek on Haaretz.com

Mossad head Tamir Pardo's visit to Washington around two weeks ago was meant to evaluate how the United States would react if Israel decided to attack Iran's nuclear facilities on its own, Newsweek magazine reports this week.

A senior American official quoted in the story said that Pardo had come to Washington to "check the pulse" of the Obama administration and to ascertain the degree to which Washington opposes an Israeli strike.

According to the report, Pardo posed a number of questions during his talks with senior administration officials, including: What military preparations are being made with regard to Iran? Is America willing to attack Iran? What would be the significance of Israel doing so on its own?

Pardo's visit was exposed last month by Haaretz after top U.S. officials, during a public hearing in the Senate, mentioned having met him earlier that week in Washington. The Senate hearing was broadcast live on American television.

Israel has also asked President Barak Obama several times for guarantees that if sanctions against Iran do not work, the United States would attack its nuclear facilities, but to date the administration has made no such commitment, the report said.

According to the report, Obama's refusal to offer these assurances was what led Israel to formulate its current position - refusing to promise restraint in anything regarding Iran or to necessarily inform the United States of a pending attack in advance.

The Newsweek story states that during the second half of 2011, Israel stopped sharing its plans regarding Iran with Washington. Between July and October, the report said, U.S. officials were in "a black hole" with regard to Israel's activities.

The reason, the article says, was Israel's anger over Obama's speech in May 2011 in which he called on Israel to conduct negotiations with the Palestinians based on the 1967 lines.

But the Americans played the withholding game as well. Senior U.S. defense officials quoted by Newsweek said there were disagreements between Israel and the United States over the assassination of Iranian nuclear scientists. The Americans took pains to make sure that intelligence information they were passing to Israel could not be used to plan assassinations, which are against U.S. law.

"We were always careful about what we said to the Israelis, and they knew why," a Defense Department official told Newsweek. "We hid things like satellite photographs and other types of intelligence."

Though America refused to take part in these attacks, it did act against nuclear facilities, sometimes alone and sometimes with Israel, the report said.

The report also revealed that when Obama took office in 2009, senior U.S. intelligence officials feared that he was about to stop all clandestine activity against Iran so as not to derail his efforts to engage Tehran in a dialogue. At issue were actions aimed at slowing Iran's nuclear progress, such as supplying defective parts to the uranium enrichment stations, introducing viruses to Iranian computer systems, and more.

Shortly after he assumed office, Obama met with Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff James Cartwright and CIA Deputy Director Stephen Kappas, who both asked Obama permission to continue the covert activities. In the end, the president decided to allow the secret activities to continue parallel to the dialogue attempt, in an effort to buy time for diplomacy to work.

The next and final war will be very short - namely because of the Israelis.

After the missile war with Lebanon / Hizbollah in 2006 and Gaza in 2008, Israel is set to the tee. If you give the Israelis that much time to prepare, while showing your entire hand in the process, Israel will exploit you over time.

The 6-Day War was of the same mochin (and it is believed we are just at the other end of that war today, waiting for its official outcome; based on the players and Land involved), this war will be called the 6 Hour War. With the planning involved, propaganda machine running, and a cunning - itchy trigger finger locked and loaded, this war should be the mother of all wars, as Saddam Hussein predicted it would be, when this current edition took place after the advent of 9/11 (which Rav Kaduri said it was the beginning of Gog V' Magog based on current events and mesora of the Gra).

This '67 / '12 war dynamic fits the Midrash, that Geulah will come, and then disappear for 45 years, and then be revelaed again; hence 1967-2012=45 year process.

The only questions is, why do the Erev Rav and their Islamic Amalek Brethren seek to seize the
moment so urgently now in 5772?

5772.1967.revisited and completed.

Read more »

The Good News Or The Bad News?

The Telegraph:

It is the front line of Israel’s deepening conflict with Iran, and beneath the snow-capped peaks of Mount Hermon the final preparations are taking shape for a conflict that promises to change the landscape of the modern Middle East.
On one side, amid the foothills of southern Lebanon, is Hizbollah, the Iranian-backed Shia militia that is busily stockpiling thousands of missiles in readiness for the next round of hostilities against its sworn enemy, Israel.
On the other side stand the men and women of Israel’s armed forces, the defenders of the Jewish state who are working on their own plans to defeat the Tehran-controlled militia that is committed to Israel’s destruction.
The last time these two combatants clashed was in the summer of 2006, when Israel launched a full-scale onslaught against Hizbollah after it kidnapped two Israeli soldiers while they were patrolling the south Lebanon border. The Second Lebanon War, as it is known in Israel, lasted for 33 days and resulted in the deaths of an estimated 1,200 people. But it ended inconclusively with Hizbollah largely intact and Ehud Olmert, the hawkish Israeli prime minister who ordered the offensive, hounded from office over his handling of the conflict.
Today, though, there is a steely determination within Israel’s high command to finish the job once and for all and eradicate the threat Hizbollah poses to Israel’s security – as I discovered this week when I visited the Israeli-Lebanese border.
RELATED ARTICLES
Israel could launch strike on Iran 'in nine months' 02 Feb 2012
Benjamin Netanyahu wins re-election as chair of Likud 01 Feb 2012
Israeli drone the size of a Boeing 737 crashes 29 Jan 2012
Iran moving closer to stage where it will be too late to destroy nuclear facilities, Israel warns 27 Jan 2012
Toddler chews head off snake 27 Jan 2012
International Holocaust Remembrance Day 27 Jan 2012
At Bravo 30, the Israeli defensive position where Hizbollah staged its audacious ambush back in 2006, I found pieces of twisted metal marking the spot where a jeep was hit by a rocket-propelled grenade fired by Hizbollah militants concealed on a nearby hill. Not far from where I stood, the black flag of Hizbollah was clearly visible on the roof of a house in a Shia village on the other side of the border. At points, the distance between these indomitable foes is so close that from an Israeli army position it is possible to hear Hizbollah fighters calling to each other.
For the moment, an uneasy truce is observed under the watchful presence of the 13,000-strong UN force that was deployed to southern Lebanon to keep the peace after the 2006 conflict. But the calm would immediately be shattered if, as seems increasingly likely, Israel becomes involved in a military confrontation with Iran over its nuclear programme.
All week, senior Israeli military and intelligence officials attending the annual Herziliya Conference on global security in Tel Aviv have been fending off questions from foreign journalists trying to discover whether Israel is about to launch unilateral air strikes to destroy Iran’s nuclear facilities.
The most convincing answer I heard – from a senior officer serving with the Israeli Defence Force – was that, while all the preparations for an Israeli strike have been completed, the final decision on whether to attack has yet to be taken by Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, and Ehud Barak, the defence minister.
Their decision rests predominantly on how Iran responds to the latest round of sanctions imposed by the US and the EU. If Iran agrees to freeze its nuclear programme, military action may be averted. But no one in Israel is prepared to allow Iran to continue building an atom bomb. Unless Iran comes to its senses, the consensus at Herziliya is that Israel will attack before the year is out. At that point, all hell will break loose along the northern border, as Iran retaliates by ordering Hizbollah to bombard Israeli towns and cities.
During the 2006 conflict, Hizbollah had about 10,000 Iranian-made rockets, most of them short-range missiles that threatened only residential areas in northern Israel. But it is estimated that Hizbollah now has more than 40,000 missiles, many with a range of up to 200 miles – enough for an attack on Tel Aviv.
In addition, the Israelis have seen a marked change in Hizbollah’s tactics. “In the past, Hizbollah fighters always wore uniforms, so they were easy to identify,” an infantry officer told me. “But now they dress as civilians so it is far harder for us to tell them apart. The next war will be an urban war.”
While Hizbollah’s primary objective will be to inflict as much damage as possible on Israel’s main population centres, the Israelis make no secret of their desire to eradicate Hizbollah’s military infrastructure, something they failed to do in 2006. During the last conflict, Israel was forced to agree to a ceasefire because of the international outcry over its air raids against Lebanese targets, such as Beirut airport. Next time, though, the Israelis are determined not to end the conflict until Hizbollah is completely destroyed as a fighting force.
“This time, the war is going to last for as long as it takes to destroy Hizbollah,” said an Israeli officer. “We will not make the same mistake of allowing them to escape.”
The only problem with this uncompromising approach, however, is the impact it will have on the rest of the region. The new Islamic government in Egypt is unlikely to stay on the sidelines while Israel tries to pummel Muslims into submission. Nor will the Syrian regime of President Bashar al-Assad, an ally of Hizbollah, stand idly by as it did in 2006. Going to war with Israel is certainly one way for Assad to end anti-government protests in that it would rally the country behind him.
Consequently, a conflict that began as a border skirmish between Israel and Hizbollah could become an all-out war between Tel Aviv and its Arab neighbours, with all the catastrophic implications that would have for both the region’s Jews and Arabs.

There are opinions that the Final War may take 3 minutes...It will be the longest 3 minutes in the history of the World.
The World is becoming more and more complex every day, and time is getting condensed. The only answer and way out is through Novelty.

(An example of Novelty and Complexity is the internet; through complex foundations, Novelty bursts through [innovations based on complexity])

An all out Middle eastern riot with Israeli weaponry of mass destruction will be a crash course to Novelty: WWII 2.0 = WWIII!

( much like the '50's that followed the Shoa, the World was complex in evil, and a new way of life and modernity was born...only this time it will be an eternal lesson learned; the Chafetz Chaim said WW2 was the beginning of what we are seeing today [70 yrs. predicted of Gog V' Magog])

...And the World became eternally Novel (at rest and at peace) in the fulfillment of the Zohar's prediction of '72?

And we have seen only a fraction of complexity in 5772...

Read more »

Reality Can Bomb Too

Palm Beach Post News:

The specter of a military attack by Israel against Iranian nuclear installations is the latest nightmare scenario to spike tensions in the Middle East.

A Jan. 29 New York Times Magazine article by an Israeli journalist quoted Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak and other Israeli military and intelligence officials on the looming possibility of Israel bombing Iran's clandestine nuclear enrichment facilities. While Iran insists the work is energy-related, Israel and international inspectors suspect the Iranians are developing nuclear weapons.

Not all those Israelis interviewed favored airstrikes, but the article concluded that such an attack would occur in 2012. Its publication has provoked intense speculation by professional Middle East-watchers in South Florida.

In the article, Moshe Ya'alon, Israel's vice prime minister, said bombing Iran was a last option, but he aligned himself with Israeli hawks.

"One way or another, Iran's nuclear program must be stopped,' he was quoted as saying. "It is a matter of months before the Iranians will be able to attain military nuclear capability. It is up to the international community to confront the regime, but nevertheless Israel has to be ready to defend itself. And we are prepared to defend ourselves in any way and anywhere that we see fit.'

If attacked, Iran would retaliate against Israel and its principal ally, the U.S., Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei implied this month when addressing new U.S. economic sanctions against Iran.

"In response to threats of oil embargo and war, we have our own threats to impose at the right time," Khamenei said .

Any discussion of Israeli -U.S. relations with Iran opens a hornets' nest of issues: Israel's tensions with Iran, but also with its other neighbors in the region; Iran's Shiite Muslim majority and the friction with its Sunni Muslim neighbors; Iran's ruling ayatollahs and their fears of regime change engineered by the West, in particular the U.S.; and the crucial interests of China and Russia in the region.

Elections are due in the U.S., Israel and Iran in the next two years and hawkish rhetoric is rumbling in all three countries.

'Nightmare for Israel'

Florida Atlantic University Middle East expert Robert Rabil visualized a worst-case scenario .

"Israel is the only country in the region currently with nuclear weapons capacity," he said. "By Iran developing nuclear weapons, that could change the entire political equation. Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Jordan would follow - the domino effect. The Israeli establishment isn't sure as to the timing and consequences of what could happen. This is a nightmare for Israel."

Iran's missiles cannot reach U.S. shores, but they can reach U.S. targets in the region.

"If Israel bombs, Iranian missiles would fly," Rabil said. "We have troops in the Persian Gulf within range of those missiles. We are trying to get out of Afghanistan and (Iran) could cause troubles for us there. And they will smuggle more missiles to Hezbollah and create much more trouble for Israel. They could create problems throughout the Gulf. The flow of oil could be affected and the world economy could tank."

FAU professor of international law Jeffrey Morton agreed the U.S. would be targeted. "If it happens we should batten down the hatches everywhere that is reachable by Iran," he said, although he wasn't sure Iran is developing a weapon or that bombs will fly.

For the moment, Israel appears to have opted for covert action against Iran. At least five Iranian nuclear scientists have been assassinated or died in mysterious circumstances since 2007. Computer worms have infected Iranian technology and other acts of sabotage delayed Iran's projects. The Iranians blame the Israeli intelligence service, Mossad.

Reportedly, some Israeli leaders want to stick to that strategy and not bomb Iran.

"What the military is concerned about is the day after a strike," Rabil said. "You have no way of stopping the retaliation that will come, not on your own terms. Terrorism will be employed. Not knowing what is going to happen next, that is the danger."

Hostile neighborhood

Even Israelis favoring an airstrike don't think that would end Iran's nuclear ambitions, only delay them.

"The only way to end those ambitions would be full-fledged invasion and occupation, a regime change," said Russell Lucas, a Florida International University professor of international relations. Such an invasion is apparently not on either the Israeli or U.S. agenda.

Morton suggested two possible reasons for the recent Israeli public statements.

"Maybe they are preparing their own people and the world for military action," he said. "But maybe they are talking about an increased likelihood of war to get Iran to slow down. It's a way to get third parties involved. One frustration for Israel is, whenever the world starts talking about Iran, something happens to cause a distraction. This puts it back on the front burner."

When Israel bombed nuclear reactors in Iraq in 1981, and Syria in 2007, it issued no obvious prior warning as it has this time. "They are advertising this because they really don't want to do this," said Ira Sheskin, a Middle East expert at the University of Miami.

But if Israelis are trying to involve the world community, how can diplomats convince Iran not to develop a weapon? Iran has the same key reason Israel has for wanting those weapons.

"Iran, like Israel, sees itself as being surrounded by enemies," said Lucas. "It has a number of neighbors it has had hostile relations with."

Until recent events in Iraq, Iran and Syria were the only countries in the region run by Shiite Muslims. Iran's relations with its Sunni neighbors are so bad, some of them are more hostile to Iran than to Israel, Sheskin said.

"The Saudis never said, 'Because Israel has nuclear weapons we need them,' " he said. "Now the Saudis are saying if Iran gets them, they will need them too. That's a Sunni-Shiite thing."

Iran weighing interests

It's also no secret that the West would like to see the end of a regime run by the ayatollahs.

"Iran is bordered by Afghanistan on one side and Iraq on the other and they are both places where lots of American troops have been recently," Sheskin said. "I can see why Iran might get nervous, although there is no reason to believe American troops would go into Iran."

The Islamic regime in Iran consolidated its power in 1979 by taking U.S. hostages and confronting President Jimmy Carter's administration. With unrest growing in the country, especially among its youth, the ayatollahs may use the issue of nuclear weapons to try to unify the nation, Lucas said.

"They can play the 'rally round the flag' card," he said. "In that case, lowering tensions with Israel would not serve their interests."

The rising tensions also occur in the midst of the worldwide economic recovery. "You don't want a war now that will send gas prices through the roof," said Lucas.

China, the largest buyer of Iranian oil, is particularly vulnerable.

"For China it is extremely important to have stability and an uninterrupted flow of oil," said Rabil. "I think probably the Chinese don't want to see a nuclear Iran. They have said recently that they are thinking of turning more to other countries for oil. So certain messages are being sent."

The hopes almost everywhere are that pragmatic heads will prevail and that no momentary event triggers war.

"This threat could become a self-fulfilling prophecy," Rabil said. "That's why I'm extremely worried."

"It will be a time of trouble for Yaakov, and from it he will be saved" - Zohar

Zohar and 5772 - The Year Of A Possible Geulah

Read more »

Israel Will Figure It Out

IsraCast Link:

"Israel's Dagan vs. Iran's Ahmadinejad"

Meir Dagan: 'Israel Air Force Is Capable Of Knocking Out Iran's Nuclear Weapons Sites But The Cost May Be Intolerable'
'According To Defense Minister Barak's Assessment, Israel Should Attack Iran Immediately'

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: 'World Will Soon Witness Great Iranian Nuclear Achievements...We Will Never Give Up Our Nuclear Enrichment Program'

The Israeli-Iranian war of words continues in more ways than one. In Israel, former Mossad chief Meir Dagan again crossed swords with Defense Minister Ehud Barak over attacking Iran. Meanwhile in Tehran, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad promised major nuclear achievements in the coming days while vowing that Iran would never give up its uranium enrichment project ... IDF intelligence believes that Iran has enriched enough low grade uranium to produce four A-bombs.
'I have full confidence the Israel Air Force can knock out Iran's nuclear weapons facilities but the cost to Israel may be intolerable'. That is the assessment of former Mossad director Meir Dagan, who resigned a year ago and promptly called on the Israeli government not to launch a unilateral strike on Iranian nuclear targets. Interviewed on Channel 2 TV, Dagan contended that the U.S. and the EU were fully aware of Iran's grand design to exert control over the Gulf and 60% of the world's oil reserves. Therefore the West would not acquiesce in the Iranians getting their hands on A-bombs to implement their goal.

Although Dagan has not been in the Israeli intelligence loop since his retirement, he was confident there was still time to give the sanctions a chance. But what of U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta's latest estimate that Iran might get a nuclear weapon 'within twelve months or less'? In fact, on retiring Dagan had estimated the Iranians would not acquire an A-bomb until 2015. Nonetheless, Dagan argued that Israel should not adopt the role of 'camp leader' against Iran - that should be left to the U.S. In his view, when you start a war you don't know how it will end and Israel could wind up in the midst of a regional conflagration. (On this score, IDF intelligence chief Gen. Aviv Kochavi has recently disclosed that Israel is now surrounded by 200,000 rockets and missiles). Dagan's bottom line - the option of a unilateral strike should be Israel's last option and launched only after all other avenues had failed.

Apparently referring to Dagan's position, Defense Minister Ehud Barak has said: 'Those who say wait until later may then find that it is too late to act'. (This recalls a statement by U.S. National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, who once referred to Iran's nuclear weapons development by saying: 'We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud!') Barak and IDF Intelligence Branch have warned that Iran is trying to gain 'immunity' by secretly developing nuclear weapons believing that no one would then dare to take them on.

Dagan said: 'I don't agree with Barak that a military strike is now the preferred option because his conclusion is that Israel should attack immediately. I say there is still time to decide at a later date. Our red lines are at different places'. The former Mossad chief, an IDF combat general also renowned for his audacity, expressed total confidence in the Israel Air Force saying it would carry out the mission successfully whenever the order might be given. When asked whether it was indeed Israeli threats to strike Iran that had finally startled the U.S. and EU into adopting stiffer sanctions, Dagan did not believe this was the case. The international community has vital interests in the Gulf and would have acted anyway. For his part, Dagan declared that he had never divulged any secret Israeli information but felt it essential that Israel conduct a public debate over what to do about the Iranian nuclear threat.

Meanwhile in Tehran, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was promising some dramatic developments to tens of thousands of Iranians who celebrated the 33rd anniversary of the Khomeini revolution. He declared: 'The world will witness some major nuclear achievements by Iran in the coming days'. Ahmadinejad vowed that Iran would never give up its uranium enrichment program. (This is the key element in producing nuclear weapons because it produces the fissile material to create the nuclear chain reaction and which is considered to be the most complex process in building an A-bomb. By already producing 20% enriched uranium, Iran has proven it has the scientific capability to upgrade to 90% that is required to produced nuclear weapons, the decision is solely political).

The guest of honor at the rally was none other than the Palestinian Prime Minister of Gaza, Ismail Haniya who pledged that Hamas would never recognize Israel. He is the new found partner of Palestinian West Bank President Mahmoud Abbas, the so-called moderate, who also refuses to recognize the Jewish state.

The Jews will have to do what Jews have always done: figure it out.

If we are in the End of Days, and we are getting more and more complex, then the Novelty will have to be an innovasion such that it is "Something New Under The Sun!"

The only problem is: That - something - new is Moshiach, and the people at war are Erev Rav - so go figure that one out!

...And it is said, not by Wisdom alone, but by the intrinsic "Sechel" of Moshiach - by which he will become Great.

Read more »

Soul Mazal And Live With Tamar Yonah INR 3.0

The Secrets of Tu B' Shevat Live With Tamar Yonah on Israel National Radio

Click Here To Listen Or Download The Radio Broadcast!

Very interesting link by Shirat Devorah about the Iran situation sent in by Rav Fish:

Click Here To Learn About Straights Of Hormuz And Gog Magog Predicted Almost 500 Years Ago!


And one writer from Israel makes common sense out of the Iranian issue:

Click Here To Read From Hirsh Goodman And His Views On Iran!

Shabbt Shalom!

Read more »

End of Days? Just Ask Iran When

JPost:

'Iran must attack Israel by 2014'
Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's strategist provided the legal and religious justification for the annihilation of Israel and the Jewish people, in a document published on conservative Farsi website Alef. Reports of the document began to circulate the internet this week.

The document, written by strategy specialist Alireza Forghani, outlined the reasons why, "In the name of Allah, Iran must attack Israel by 2014."

Claiming to only represent the personal opinion of its author, and not the Iranian government, the doctrine was published on a website believed to have close ties with the Ayatollah.

Forghani called the Jewish state a "cancerous tumor for the Middle East" and reminded his readers that "All our troubles are due to Israel!"

"Every Muslim is obliged to equip himself against Israel," he urged, reasoning that if the Muslim world does not attack Israel in the near future, "the opportunity could be lost and it may not be possible to stop them."

The document explained that the war against Israel must be carried out in the name of "defensive jihad" - or the protecting of Islam against aggressors "who want to gain domination over the Muslims and kill them."

It also clarified that although Israel had yet to strike Iran, its occupation of Palestinian lands already justifies an attack as Islam dictates that "the political borders [of the world] cannot divide Muslims and the earth is divided into two parts - Muslim countries and non-Muslim countries."



Forghani pointed out that Israel is the only country in the world with a Jewish majority, using the findings of the Israel Central Bureau of Statistics's last consensus for veracity.

He posited that since Israel requires US and western support in order to attack Iran, the latter should take advantage of western "passiveness" to "wipe out Israel."

The document also provides a "concise description of mid- and long-range ballistic missiles that can target territories of this regional cancerous tumor" and destroy Israel in "less than nine minutes."

Funny, the Zohar in its description of the last possible scenario of Geulah in this current Tekufa (Time Period) of "66" and "72-ness" give an End Date last time of being just before 2014 (5774) or even quite possibly into just before 2015 (5775 - Erev 5775). The reason for this is, that in Jewish Time there is always a +/- "2" ratio when understanding "Time." Thus Iran seems to be aware of a "Last Chance Effort."

The reason for the +/- ration is the following:

If we are told to pray in the 4th hour of the day that begins at 6 A.M. on a basic 24-hour clock (12/12) what time would that be? The answer is NOT 10 A.M.!
We have what is termed inclusive hours and non-inclusive hours:
If the first hour is at 6, then the first hour extends until 6:59, and 7:00 is the 2nd hour. If we start at 6:01 until 7:00 as the first hour, then we have until 7:59 until termed the next hour.

Thus to pray in the 10th hour, as the Talmud explains it, we would have from 9:00 A.M. until 10:59 A.M., thus creating a +/- ration of nearly 2 hours.

[11:00 A.M. would be the 5th hour and 9:00 A.M. marks the beginning of the 4th hour]

What we also learn from this example is that Time is in extended periods by definition; thus Moshiach's arrival would be extended through time as revelation.

So when Geulah happens in 5773 as a late date, we must figure in that it can extend until Erev 5775. And this is precisely the Time Reflected by Iran. And they are right, by then it will be a lost effort. Their only mistake in their calculations are that anyways they are futile: No One stops Hashem in Geulah!

All we can hope is that the sooner the better, like 5772 for example, Please God!

Read more »

Libya...I Mean Syria Is Going Down Obama Style

When Damascus will cease to be a city (as Prophecy mandates), perhaps Petra (as seen in the picture) will be considered a greater metropolis than all of civilized Syria...all for messing with The Obama and The Israeli Propaganda: but come on Assad, you don't need to kill people and then claim to have the intellect of a 7-year old about it.

UPI.com

The double veto by Russia and China of a U.N. Security Council resolution on political transition in strife-torn Syria appears to sound the death knell for a diplomatic solution and herald an all-out civil war that will destabilize the Middle East.

Lebanon and probably Iraq, Syria's neighbors where sectarian tensions are already high and getting worse, will more than likely be dragged into the maelstrom.

Israel, which sees itself facing an unprecedented threat from a sustained missile bombardment by its foes, is also jittery that the Persian Gulf confrontation between the West and Iran, Syria's ally, could trigger a region-wide conflict in which it will be a target.

Israel's political and military leaders have escalated threats to unleash pre-emptive military strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities, sharply heightening regional tensions.

All in all, the Middle East, a crucible of war for more than 60 years, has been gripped by alarm and uncertainty as it's convulsed by the political upheaval of the Arab Spring in which four tyrants have been toppled by their own, long-downtrodden people.

The 11-month-old uprising in Syria, with an estimated body count of 6,000, has become the bloodiest front line of the Arab Spring.

And unless Moscow and Beijing can soon convince Syria's embattled president, Bashar Assad, whose father founded the regime in Damascus in 1970, on some kind of transition of power, the country may explode into a sectarian conflict between the ruling Alawite minority and the Sunni majority.

Indeed, Western analysts say the double veto will only accelerate the slide toward civil war.

That could, in the end, play into U.S. hands and Washington's desire for regime change in Damascus to block Iran's drive to establish an arc of influence through Iraq, Syria and Lebanon.

Russia and China saw the U.N. resolution as the precursor of Libya-style Western intervention to achieve political and economic objectives -- a pattern they feared could work against them in the future.

In the run-up to Saturday's Security Council vote, Assad, possibly encouraged by the backing of Moscow and Beijing, ordered his forces to unleash artillery and tank fire on key centers of the uprising, reportedly killing 200-300 people.

U.S. President Barack Obama branded the slaughter an "unspeakable assault" but the double veto left the international community bitterly divided and seemingly helpless as the bloodletting intensified.

It may not have been solely coincidence that the sustained shelling marked the 30th anniversary of the massacre of up to 30,000 Sunni Muslims in the city of Hama in western Syria by Assad's strongman father, Hafez Assad.

On Feb. 3, 1982, Hafez Assad sent thousands of troops into Hama to begin a bloodbath that crushed an uprising by the Muslim Brotherhood. His forces shelled Hama for three weeks, razing much of the old city.

Even in the violence-plagued Middle East, the Hama slaughter was mind-numbing in its obliterating intensity.

In recent weeks, Hama has been the scene of bloody fighting as anti-regime forces, which launched the uprising with unarmed street protests, increasingly take up the gun.

In the wider, geopolitical context, the Russia-China double act points to trouble ahead as Moscow and Beijing strive to fill the vacuum left by the United States' ebbing power in the Middle East.

The events unfolding in Syria and the Persian Gulf are linked. If Assad falls, Iran loses its gateway to the Levant and its expansionist thrust westward.

"In the expansion of Iranian influence, Syria is now the major battlefield," observed U.S. security consultancy Strafor.

Russia is backing Assad, including with the supply of advanced weaponry, because he's Moscow's last chance of restoring its Cold War influence in the Arab world. China supposedly just wants access to the oil.

Now, says veteran Indian analyst M.K. Bhadrakumar, "with the double veto, the only option available for the U.S. and its allies in Syria is to flout both international law and the U.N. Charter and overthrow the regime in Damascus."

In that regard, Philip Giraldi, a former CIA officer, writes in The American Conservative that "unmarked NATO warplanes are arriving at Turkish military bases close to Iskenderun on the Syrian border" where the rebel Free Syrian Army is based.

As Terence Mckenna states in his 2012 videos that were made from approx. 1970-2000 (before we in the mainstream had even heard of the Mayans and their calendar; which his theories have nothing to do with exclusively):
As we descend into the End of Time: the World will become more novel, i.e. amazingly complex.

Such is the Middle East, where civilizations started and apparently where they end.
And between now and "then", it will only become exponentially greater in density.
From complexity/Novelty, comes actual Novelty...and there is none more complex than now, and nothing would be as Novel as Moshiach and a return to an Ancient Book; something that defines complexity and Novelty - Returning To The Divine.

Isn't that what the World really needs anyways, objectively in 5772?

Read more »

Covert War On Iran - Mossad 2.0?

Boston.com

Lifting a half-century veil of secrecy, Israel's Mossad spy agency is opening its archive this week to reveal the story behind the legendary 1960 capture of Nazi mastermind Adolf Eichmann.

The "Operation Finale" exhibit, curated by a Mossad officer who can't be fully identified, displays never before seen items, names and documents that led to Eichmann's nabbing in Argentina. It also discloses new details, such as how forensic experts identified Eichmann by his ears.

Eichmann was in charge of implementing Adolf Hitler's "final solution," the plan to exterminate the Jews of Europe. Six million Jews were killed by the Nazis and their collaborators during World War II.

The Mossad's exploits typically become known only when something goes wrong. This exhibit tells a success story, offering the most comprehensive picture to date of the complex operation that helped shape the agency's image -- bringing a top Nazi criminal to justice.

"This is the first time the Mossad carried out a huge operation overseas, and it had to invent all this 'James Bond' stuff in the process," said the curator, who can be identified only as Avner A. because of agency regulations.

"This operation made the Mossad," he said. "It proved to itself and to the entire world that it could pull off an operation at the end of the world with a variety of bodies, under all kinds of identities and with various technical and technological means."

Avner said the agency's tactics and strategies have evolved since then. Even so, the exhibit was initially intended to remain classified, but "the Eichmann story is so strong that we just couldn't keep this one to ourselves."

Among the highlights of the exhibit at the Beit Hatfutsot museum of the Jewish people in Tel Aviv are the original Mossad file on Eichmann, code named "Dybbuk" -- Hebrew for "evil spirit," the briefcase with a concealed camera that took the first pictures of Eichmann in Buenos Aires, the fake license plates the agents made for vehicles to track Eichmann, the gloves used to nab him, the needle used to sedate him and the forged Israeli passport his captors used to smuggle him out of Argentina.

Eichmann's 1961 trial in Jerusalem captivated the country and the world with gripping public testimony of more than 100 Jews who survived extreme torture and deprivation in concentration camps and brought to life the horrors of the Nazi "final solution."

Eichmann was convicted of war crimes and crimes against humanity and was hanged the following year, the only time Israel has carried out a death sentence.

After the war ended in Germany's defeat, Eichmann escaped American captivity and fled to Argentina in 1950, assuming the name Ricardo Klement.

There he kept out of sight until 1957, when his eldest son, Nick, befriended a girl named Silvia.
Her father, Lothar Hermann, was a Holocaust survivor. After becoming suspicious of the young Eichmann, he dispatched a letter, displayed in the exhibit, to Fritz Bauer, a fellow Jewish Holocaust survivor, who was the German state of Hesse's chief prosecutor. Bauer informed the Israelis, who started investigating.

Two years later, Mossad agent Zvi Aharoni located the family home on Garibaldi Street in Buenos Aires and returned with photographs of Ricardo Klement that matched those taken of Adolf Eichmann. Israeli forensic experts matched the details of the ears in each photo for final confirmation.

On the evening of May 11, 1960, a seven-man team waited near the bus station where Eichmann arrived each evening from his job at a Mercedes Benz factory.

After Eichmann got off the bus, agent Zvi Malkin jumped on him, making sure to put his gloved hand inside Eichmann's mouth, in case he had a cyanide pill hidden inside a tooth as some former top Nazis were known to have in case of capture, Avner said.

Two agents helped shove Eichmann into the getaway car where a fourth agent, Aharoni, awaited.

"If you move," Aharoni told Eichmann, "you will be shot in the head," according to the Mossad exhibit.

Eichmann mumbled back in German: "I accept my fate."

The exhibit also showcases the personal effects found on Eichmann's body -- a comb, a pocket knife and a plastic cigarette holder.

Eichmann was held in a safe house for nine days until the group flew out in an El Al Israel Airlines plane that had brought an official Israeli delegation to mark Argentina's 150th anniversary. Eichmann was drugged, dressed in an El Al uniform, seated in first class and passed off as a crew member who was ill.

The operation was so secret that even diplomat Abba Eban, who later became Israel's foreign minister, had no clue he was providing cover for a plane to return to Israel with Eichmann and the Mossad team, leaving Eban and other diplomats behind.

In researching the operation, Avner said he made several new discoveries. For instance, there was a Plan B, should the airlift fail, to smuggle Eichmann in a freighter ship transporting frozen meat, and even a Plan C that called for him to be dropped off at a halfway house in Europe before a final trip to Israel.

Avner even found the Israeli optometrist who agreed to prepare glasses for Eichmann, after his original pair were broken during his capture. The glasses were made of plastic to prevent Eichmann from using glass to slit his wrists.

"The more I discover new details, the more I realize that I don't have the full story," said Avner, before adding. "We'll probably never truly know the full story."

If this was Israel's breakthrough in long distance espionage, then what is in store for today? One must assume with time going by, and lessons learned from Israel's last two wars (Hizbollah and Gaza), and with a wealth of time to plan, Israel is well equipped to bring down Iran. If Obama brought down Libya without firing one shot, then Israel may be prepared to perform a controlled demolition type of war to Iran; much like the 9/11 event...oops, did I say that? [ buildings don't just fall, however you draw it up, there was demolition there]
I assume we will see demolition demonstration in Iran, with a grande finale feeling to this world.
Moshiach in 5772? Sure feels like it.

Read more »

2012: The Cosmic Tu B'Shvat

Here is a new thought:
There are 6000 years of creation, and we liken these years to 6 days of the working week. Thus 1000 years is 1 day on the cosmic clock. The year 5500 was 6 A.M. for example.
The notion is, that by 6 P.M. will culminate all 6000 years of creation and we shall enter the Great Shabbos, trekking into the abyss of 6000-7000 blissful Shabbos Years.

Everyone knows of a 2012 concept, a sort of cyclic time theory of the Mayan Calendar. One idea floating with the Mayan premise, is that Dec 21 2012 would usher in the Age of Aquarius.
Each astrological age runs roughly 2000 years, and we are coming to the end of the 3rd 2000 year cycle: 2000 years of Tohu, 2000 years of Torah, and 2000 years of Moshiach....into the last segment: 2000 + years of Shabbos.

What connection can we see within Aquarius and Judaism? The answer is simple: Tu' B' Shvat: The Rosh Hashana of the Trees. Adam was commanded to not eat from The Tree Of Knowledge, and he did not eat of the Tree of Life either - being exiled from Gan Eden. On Tu'B'Shavt, we are commanded to eat of trees and davka their fruit. The month of Shevat, is synonymous with D'Li / Aquarius in Jewish Astrology.

Click here for Jewish Astrology on Shirat Devorah: For an explanation and background.

In short, will the Messianic Age be that of a return to Gan Eden to eat of the Trees of Knowledge and Life, and enter into the Shabbos that Adam was to merit?  Perhaps we are on a cosmic clock of destiny, one that is davka of the Trees and Fruit...Dec 21 2012 =  Tu ' B' Shvat of a Cosmic Nature  = Jewish D'Li/Aquarius, signaling the end of a Jewish 2000 year age: Galus...and moving into 2000 + years of Shabbos/ Eternal Geulah.

The return to the Garden of Eden, to eat the Fruit of Adam, Fruit that he was to earn the right to eat from...a return to Innocence...a Cosmic Return...A Cosmic Rosh Hashana...A Cosmic Tu'B'Shvat...Mazal D'Li - Jewish Time.
2012/5772-3...Moshiach Tzidkenu

Read more »