Monday, April 16, 2012

Obama [HaGog] vs. Zohar: Fine, I'm Not Coming!

Is Obama playing with perception? Does he do anything because it's just a good idea?
[without calculating how to manipulate thought patterns of the masses]

Mr. Obama went to Washington, then to Cairo. But even as his likely campaign-trail foe and conservatives hammer him over his chilly relations with Israel, experts say Mr. Obama won't be going to Jerusalem any time soon.
Mitt Romney, who is close to securing the Republican nomination, has said President Barack Obama "chastised" Israel and has been soft on Iran, the Jewish state's biggest enemy. Romney says if voters send him to the White House, his first official overseas trip will be to Israel.
The conservative wing of the Republican Party also believes Obama has given short shrift to what experts say is still Washington's closest Middle Eastern ally. "Obama Hearts Israel ... Oh, Really?" blares a headline on the conservative-leaning Heritage Foundation's website.
In March, the president faced critics at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee's annual conference in Washington to defend his record.
[See a collection of political cartoons on Iran.]
"Over the last three years, as president of the United States, I have kept my commitments to the state of Israel," Obama said. "At every crucial juncture, at every fork in the road, we have been there for Israel. Every single time."
Pro-Israel conservatives immediately blasted the president's remarks, but experts say Air Force One won't be touching down on Israeli soil this year. Here are three reasons why:
Strategy. Obama took office in 2009, and almost immediately took a harder stance toward Israel than recent U.S. presidents before him. He also went to Cairo for a seminal speech that was billed by the White House as offering an olive branch to the Arab world. "At the time, there were tensions between new presidents Obama and Netanyahu," says Nathan Brown of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, referring to Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu. "But if Obama had gone to Israel after the Cairo speech, it would have sent the opposite message to the Arab world than he intended.
Brown calls the lack of an Israeli trip "part of an overall approach" and adds, "if the president hasn't gone by now, he probably won't go--at least not this year."
Politics. Even if the president felt a need to travel across the Atlantic to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with Netanyahu as Washington and Tel Aviv stare down Iran, a trip is highly unlikely. "The problem now is if you go, you look like you would be giving in to pressure," says Larry Korb of the Center for American Progress.
Some pundits have opined Obama's strategy will undercut his support among Jewish-American voters. Not so, says Brown.
"Most Jewish-Americans base their votes on a whole host of issues," says Brown. "Plus, the flavor of the GOP right now on cultural issues is no place for most Jewish-American voters. It is a big issue, however, for specific people. So the president might lose a very small share of what already is a very small share of the total electorate."
[Read Navy Adds Muscle in Middle East to Counter Iran.]
Heavy numbers of Jewish-American voters reside in Florida and New York. Experts say the Israeli issue won't be the determining factor in the Sunshine State, always a key swing state, come November. As for the Empire State, Brown quips: "Any Democratic president who loses New York isn't getting re-elected."
Precedent. There is something of a conventional wisdom that all American presidents are required to visit Israel. But that's not the case. Since Israel's creation in 1948, more U.S. presidents--including Obama--have opted against visiting the Jewish state. Four have made an official visit: Richard Nixon, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, and George W. Bush. Notably, Nixon and Bush went in their second terms. But seven U.S. presidents did not go: Harry Truman, Dwight D. Eisenhower, John F. Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson, George H.W. Bush, Gerald Ford, and Ronald Reagan.
"The way people perceive it is as soon as a president takes the oath of office, he goes right over there," says Korb. "But that's just not the case. Many presidents have instead let their secretary of state handle that trip."

...somehow [here's for all of you Star Trek fans] I don't think Tuvix is the solution Israel needs...but quite frankly "Hillama" probably fits the Zohar in the best possible way. How you might ask - I have no just seems right to me?! (sigh...)

Clinton taking the role of Gog? Daniel prophecy anyone? - Daniel 7:24:
"The ten horns (10 presidents since the inception of the state of Israel) are ten kings who will come from this kingdom. After them another king will arise, different from the earlier ones; he will subdue three kings."
 (Place Obama and Clinton  here!)

[10 years ago it seemed obvious Clinton would make her run for president in 2008 - fitting for Daniel]

- So just throw them together and say she is his Shliach?
- Isn't that easier and more practical in alignment with the reality at hand?
- Joking aside, no worries, he'll be here at some time to live out his Imam Mahdi Messianic delusions of I don't think "Oballary" is the truth; sorry Star Trek fans.

Surprise Obama to Israel in '73? - Never doubt a poker player!
How Do You Spell Broken Protocol? O-B-A-M-A


Devash said...

Ten presidents not counting Ford who was not elected but served out Nixon's term as Speaker of the House after he resigned in disgrace. We've seen Obama take out Mubarak and Qadafi. Will Assad be the third?

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Design by Free WordPress Themes | Bloggerized by Lasantha - Premium Blogger Themes |